Protection of Whistle-Blowers in India: A Need? | legal journals

 

Abstract 

A person who divulges wrongdoing, fraud, corruption, or mismanagement is known as a Whistle-blower. The individual will often be an employee, and he is the individual who becomes adept at the manipulation or fraud that takes place within a corporation or institution. Suffering the true and weak voices has been the key agenda of the political parties that have been sold and initiated as 'monetary favors' and come to power by electoral bank policies and collect political parties from Corporate Honchos. 

It was a unilateral equation between crooked political parties and business honchos of authoritarian greed. However, as all companies forbid the disclosure of administrative records, the whistle-blower frequently risks punishment, such as work firing and even physical injury. Whistle-blowers are the conscience keepers of the nation, who risk everything to bring the guilty and corrupt to the task. 

The present research aims to focus upon the concerns and problems related to the administration of the justice delivery system due to the absence of an appropriate legal mechanism to protect the Informers and Whistle-blowers in our country. 

Attempts have been made using doctrinal and case-study methods to understand why and under what conditions many people stay silent rather than speaking out. The paper focuses on the need for Strict Laws for the Protection of Whistle-Blowers by analyzing the cases and legislation. A systematic probe in these questions has been made in the study.

Introduction

If a corporation (company) wants to make sure effective Corporate Governance, it can often be done by having complete transparency in Internal as well as external dealings of the company. Transparency in the business of the organisation can be accomplished through aggressive management and strict corporate policy. 

To identify internal bribery and wrongdoing within the organisation and provide a fast method of dealing with the violations that are not publicly identified, a form of transparency must be used. However, if such a resolution mechanism does not exist in an organisation, it will need to address whistle-blowing in the future. There is no standard definition of Whistle-blowing. 

The most recognised term in the academic sphere was set out by Near and Miceli (1985), which defines whistle-blowing as "disclosure by organisation members (former or current) of illegal, immoral, or illegitimate practices under the control of their employers, to persons or organisations that may be able to effect action." 

The same as defined by the I.L.O. as "the reporting by employees or former employees of illegal, irregular, dangerous or unethical practices by employers" The whistle-blower policy in India aims to safeguard the interest of the general public. Employees whoreveal fraud, corruption or mismanagement to the senior management are called internal whistleblower, and the employees who report fraud or corruption to the media, public or law authorities are known as the external whistle-blowers. Indian Whistle-Blowers are protected under the Whistleblowing Protection Act. 

The need for a comprehensive legal system for the safety of whistle-blowers has become important as whistle-blower allegations in India are increasing. It has been made public in every leading publication and on every major network to deal with accusations from whistle-blowers from listed multinational corporations and banks. This paper analyses whether the current law system in India offers corporations and whistle-blowers sufficient transparency and protection and addresses the Whistle Blowers Law, which is prevalent in countries other than India.

Statement of Problem

The current research needs to concentrate on the issues and problems associated with the justice delivery system's administration to protect the country's whistle-blowers. Attempts have been made using the doctrinal approach to understand why and under what conditions many people stay silent rather than speaking out. What are the different kinds of whistle-blowers? Is the current legal framework enough to protect whistle-blowers? Is there a need for Strict Law for the Protection of Whistleblowers based on case studies? The research conducted a systemic investigation into these issues. Taking into account international measures for whistle-blower protection, an effort has been made to analyse the current legal stance for whistle-blower protection in a country such as India.

 Research Hypothesis

'1. The fundamental assumption of the study is that the existing safeguards are not adequate. 2. An examination of Whistle-blowers legislations of other countries would give us valuable information for the formulation of enabling whistle-blower protection legislation. 3. The concept of Whistle-blowers protection is still in the initial stage, and the law is evolving. 4. There would be novel and unexplored dimensions to Whistle-blowers protection in India. Innovative strategies have to be adopted and developed. Strengthening the whistle-blower protection mechanism will help in ensuring that the integrity of democracy is protected, cherished and upheld.

Research Methodology

The literature survey is the methodology adopted for this paper. This paper uses information publicly available on various websites, online newspapers, newspapers, different books, case laws, and reports produced by different organizations. In the same sections, these sources and the arguments advanced through them are analyzed to present an analysis to confirm or negate the hypothesis. 

What is Whistle-blowing? 

In general, a whistle-blower is defined as someone who makes a 'disclosure.' Broadly speaking, disclosure refers "to a concern raised in writing and in good faith by an employee or group of employees of the Company or even a third party that discloses or displays information about an unethical or inappropriate activity with respect to the Company that is based on facts and is not speculation." There is no standard definition on whistle-blowing prevailing but certain conventions, as well as some books, defines whistle-blowing: The United Nations Convention against Corruption lays down the definition of whistle-blowing as. "any person who reports in good faith and on reasonable grounds to the competent authorities any facts concerning offences established in accordance with this convention." Near and Miceli (1985) provide an academic definition of whistle-blowing, which describes whistle-blowing as "disclosure by organization members (former or current) of illegal, immoral, or illegitimate practices under the control of their employers, to persons or organizations that may be able to effect action." 

Background of law relating to whistle-blowing: Indian scenario 

Whistle-blowers, in simple words, is a person who discloses the illicit or corrupt practices in which the Company (corporation) is involved. In its 2001 Report, the Law Commission advised that in order to eradicate corruption from the country, a strong law protecting whistle-blowers be enacted. In the case of the infamous murder of an NHAI official in 2004, the Supreme Court directed the Central Government to establish 'administrative machinery for acting on complaints from whistle-blowers until a law is enacted.' Following the Supreme Court's directive, the government released a Resolution titled Public Interest 

Disclosure and Informer Protection Resolution (PIDPIR). In addition, the Central Vigilance Commission was established to investigate complaints filed by whistle-blowers. In its report in 2007, Second Administrative Reforms Commission also recommended that a specific law needs to be enacted to protect whistle-blowers. Similarly, the U.N. Convention on Corruption proposes that a separate law be enacted to protect whistle-blowers; India has been a signatory to the Convention on Corruption since 2005, though it has not yet been ratified. The U.N. Convention on Corruption also provides for the safeguards against the victimization of the whistle-blower. In order to conform to these regulations, the Government in the Year 2011 proposed the Whistle-blowers Protection Bill, 2011, which later become the Law in the year 2014. Similarly, the Companies Act of 2013 and The Regulations of SEBI also protect the whistle-blowers. Read more